{"id":4116,"date":"2026-02-18T23:50:35","date_gmt":"2026-02-18T23:50:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/?p=4116"},"modified":"2026-02-24T23:09:23","modified_gmt":"2026-02-24T23:09:23","slug":"top-10-medical-dramas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/top-10-medical-dramas\/","title":{"rendered":"Top 10 Medical Dramas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

TV Shows with Radiology Focus<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Show<\/strong><\/th>Years<\/strong><\/th>Network<\/strong><\/th>Radiology Prominence<\/strong><\/th>Uses<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
ER<\/strong><\/td>1994\u20132009<\/td>NBC<\/td>High<\/strong><\/td>Rapid emergency imaging, CT\/ultrasound triage, overnight reads<\/td><\/tr>
House MD<\/strong><\/td>2004\u20132012<\/td>Fox<\/td>High<\/strong><\/td>Imaging as diagnostic pivot; advanced modalities and image\u2011guided biopsies<\/td><\/tr>
Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/strong><\/td>2005\u2013present<\/td>ABC<\/td>Medium<\/strong><\/td>Imaging in surgical planning, incidental findings, multidisciplinary review<\/td><\/tr>
The Knick<\/strong><\/td>2014\u20132015<\/td>Cinemax<\/td>High<\/strong><\/td>Historical radiography, early X\u2011ray practice and safety lessons<\/td><\/tr>
M<\/em>ASH<\/em>*<\/td>1972\u20131983<\/td>CBS<\/td>High<\/strong><\/td>Mobile X\u2011ray units, field radiography, wartime imaging improvisation<\/td><\/tr>
St. Elsewhere<\/strong><\/td>1982\u20131988<\/td>NBC<\/td>Medium<\/strong><\/td>Academic radiology rounds, diagnostic error, systems issues<\/td><\/tr>
Chicago Hope<\/strong><\/td>1994\u20132000<\/td>CBS<\/td>Medium<\/strong><\/td>Academic tension, CT\/MRI in complex cases<\/td><\/tr>
Code Black<\/strong><\/td>2015\u20132018<\/td>CBS<\/td>High<\/strong><\/td>Resource\u2011limited imaging decisions, point\u2011of\u2011care ultrasound<\/td><\/tr>
The Resident<\/strong><\/td>2018\u20132023<\/td>Fox<\/td>Medium<\/strong><\/td>Systems failures, imaging errors, interventional radiology<\/td><\/tr>
The Good Doctor<\/strong><\/td>2017\u2013present<\/td>ABC<\/td>Medium<\/strong><\/td>Imaging interpretation, team communication, visual pattern recognition<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

ER<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ER<\/em> redefined the modern medical drama with a relentless, documentary\u2011style depiction of emergency medicine that foregrounded time\u2011sensitive imaging decisions. The show\u2019s early seasons popularized the image of the emergency department as a place where seconds matter and where radiology\u2014portable chest X\u2011rays, rapid head CTs, focused ultrasound\u2014directly determines life or death. ER<\/em>\u2019s influence on the genre is widely acknowledged in retrospective rankings and critical histories of television medical dramas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How radiology is used narratively<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across hundreds of episodes, ER<\/em> uses imaging in three recurring narrative modes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • Triage and time\u2011pressure pivot.<\/strong> A patient arrives with altered mental status or trauma; the team orders an immediate head CT or FAST ultrasound; the scan reveals a hemorrhage or pneumothorax and the plot pivots to emergent intervention. These sequences dramatize the real clinical chain: rapid image acquisition, immediate interpretation (often by the ED physician), and urgent action. The show repeatedly compresses the timeline\u2014scan, read, surgery\u2014so viewers feel the stakes of imaging delays.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Diagnostic reveal.<\/strong> Subtle radiographic findings\u2014an occult rib fracture, a small pulmonary embolus on CT pulmonary angiography, a foreign body on X\u2011ray\u2014are used as the \u201caha\u201d that resolves a case. The camera lingers on the image, and the attending physician\u2019s interpretation becomes the moral and clinical turning point.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Systems and human factors.<\/strong> ER<\/em> also dramatizes the operational side: scanner availability, radiology backlogs, overnight teleradiology reads, and miscommunication of critical results. Episodes that show a delayed read leading to harm function as cautionary tales about handoffs and the need for robust critical result notification systems.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    Clinical realism and limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    ER<\/em> generally captures the urgency of emergency imaging well: the prominence of CT for head trauma and stroke, the use of bedside ultrasound for FAST exams, and the reliance on portable radiography for unstable patients. At times the show simplifies or accelerates radiology workflows for dramatic effect\u2014instantaneous reads, immediate availability of advanced subspecialty interpretation, or scans performed without the usual pre\u2011scan checks\u2014but these compressions serve narrative momentum rather than clinical instruction. The series also helped normalize the idea that emergency physicians often make preliminary imaging interpretations before formal radiology reports are available, a real\u2011world practice that carries both necessity and risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Radiology characters and interprofessional dynamics<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    While ER<\/em> centers on emergency physicians and surgeons, it occasionally brings radiologists into the frame\u2014either as consultants or as off\u2011screen voices whose reports arrive at critical moments. The show\u2019s depiction of interprofessional tension\u2014ED clinicians pushing for rapid imaging versus radiology\u2019s need for quality control\u2014reflects genuine workplace dynamics and underscores the importance of clear communication channels and mutual respect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Impact on public perception<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    By repeatedly showing scans as decisive evidence, ER<\/em> contributed to a public perception of imaging as both miraculous and infallible. The show also highlighted the human cost of delayed imaging and the ethical dilemmas of resource allocation in busy urban hospitals. For many viewers, ER<\/em> was an introduction to the language of CT, ultrasound, and X\u2011ray and to the idea that imaging is central to modern emergency care. Critical lists and retrospectives place ER<\/em> among the most influential medical dramas of its era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    House MD<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    House MD<\/em> is a diagnostic procedural drama in which imaging functions as a primary detective tool. The series centers on Dr. Gregory House, a diagnostician whose team uses imaging\u2014CT, MRI, PET, angiography\u2014alongside labs and biopsies to solve rare and often exotic medical puzzles. The show\u2019s format makes radiology a recurring narrative engine: images are clues, misleads, or confirmations. Critics and audiences have consistently ranked House<\/em> among the most memorable medical dramas for its cerebral approach to diagnosis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Radiology as plot device<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    House<\/em> uses imaging in several characteristic ways:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    • Image as clue.<\/strong> A single radiologic finding\u2014an unusual calcification on CT, a focal MRI signal abnormality, or an unexpected PET uptake\u2014often triggers a cascade of hypotheses. The team\u2019s process mirrors real diagnostic reasoning: generate differential diagnoses, order targeted imaging or image\u2011guided biopsy, and refine the diagnosis based on correlation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Artifact and misinterpretation.<\/strong> The show frequently dramatizes false leads caused by imaging artifacts, prior surgeries, or incidentalomas. These plotlines underscore a real clinical truth: images must be interpreted in context, and overreliance on a single modality can misdirect care.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Image\u2011guided procedures.<\/strong> House<\/em> occasionally depicts image\u2011guided biopsies and interventional procedures, showing how radiology provides not just diagnosis but also access to tissue and therapy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Accuracy and dramatization<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      House<\/em> excels at portraying the intellectual thrill of diagnostic imaging but often compresses timelines and simplifies multidisciplinary workflows. The show\u2019s depiction of immediate access to advanced imaging and rapid turnaround for complex studies is dramatized; in reality, specialized imaging and interventional procedures require scheduling, consent, and coordination. Nevertheless, the program does a service by illustrating the interpretive complexity of imaging and by showing how radiologic patterns can narrow differentials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Ethical and educational themes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Many House<\/em> episodes use imaging to raise ethical questions: when to pursue invasive image\u2011guided testing, how to handle incidental findings, and how to weigh the risks of radiation or contrast against diagnostic necessity. The show\u2019s emphasis on correlation\u2014matching imaging to clinical exam and labs\u2014models good diagnostic practice even when the narrative takes liberties for dramatic effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Influence on radiology\u2019s public image<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      House<\/em> popularized the image of the radiologic scan as a detective\u2019s clue and helped viewers appreciate the interpretive skill required to read complex studies. The show\u2019s focus on rare diseases also reinforced the idea that imaging can reveal hidden pathologies, though it sometimes skewed public expectations toward rare diagnoses rather than common conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/em> is a long\u2011running surgical drama that uses imaging as a routine element of surgical planning, transplant evaluation, and interpersonal conflict. The show\u2019s longevity has allowed it to depict evolving imaging technologies and to explore ethical dilemmas tied to incidental findings and surveillance imaging. Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/em> is frequently cited in popular lists of top medical dramas for its emotional storytelling and ensemble cast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Radiology\u2019s narrative roles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      In Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/em>, imaging appears in three main narrative registers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      • Surgical planning.<\/strong> CT angiography, MRI, and ultrasound are shown as essential tools for preoperative mapping\u2014defining tumor margins, vascular anatomy, and organ relationships. These sequences often precede high\u2011stakes operations and are used to justify surgical approaches.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      • Incidental findings and ethical dilemmas.<\/strong> The show repeatedly uses incidentalomas discovered on imaging to create moral tension: whether to disclose uncertain findings, how to manage surveillance, and how to balance patient anxiety against the low probability of malignancy.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      • Multidisciplinary conferences.<\/strong> Grey\u2019s<\/em> stages tumor boards and transplant meetings where radiologic images are reviewed and debated, illustrating the collaborative nature of complex care.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

        Realism and dramatic license<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/em> tends to prioritize emotional stakes over procedural accuracy. Imaging is often presented as decisive evidence in ways that simplify diagnostic uncertainty. However, the show does accurately reflect the centrality of imaging in surgical decision making and the frequent need for multidisciplinary interpretation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Radiology and character development<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Imaging sequences in Grey\u2019s<\/em> are frequently used to develop character arcs\u2014surgeons confronting the limits of their skills, trainees learning to interpret scans, and patients grappling with the implications of imaging results. This humanizes radiology and situates it within broader narratives of care, responsibility, and professional growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Public impact<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        By repeatedly dramatizing imaging\u2011driven dilemmas, Grey\u2019s Anatomy<\/em> has shaped public conversations about incidental findings, the emotional burden of surveillance, and the role of imaging in life\u2011altering decisions such as transplantation and cancer surgery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        The Knick<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

        Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        The Knick<\/em> is a period medical drama set in the early 20th century that foregrounds the infancy of modern medicine, including the nascent practice of radiography. The series is notable for its historically grounded depiction of early X\u2011ray experiments, specimen radiography, and the occupational hazards that accompanied early imaging practice. Critics have praised The Knick<\/em> for its meticulous production design and for illuminating the ethical and safety dilemmas of medical innovation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Historical radiology on screen<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        The Knick<\/em> uses radiology to dramatize several historical themes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \n
        • Technical infancy.<\/strong> The show depicts primitive X\u2011ray tubes, fragile photographic plates, and the improvisational nature of early imaging. Scenes of specimen radiography and early attempts at in vivo imaging convey how clinicians adapted physics discoveries to clinical problems.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        • Occupational harm and safety evolution.<\/strong> Characters suffer burns and chronic injuries from radiation exposure\u2014reflecting real historical tragedies that spurred the development of radiation protection and medical physics. The series does not romanticize innovation; it shows the human cost of experimentation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        • Institutional change.<\/strong> Radiology in The Knick<\/em> is a lever for institutional modernization: new departments, training programs, and the professionalization of radiologic practice are shown as part of the hospital\u2019s broader transformation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

          Accuracy and interpretation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          While dramatized, The Knick<\/em> is careful to represent the period\u2019s scientific uncertainty and the slow emergence of safety norms. The show\u2019s depiction of early radiography is a rare example of television using imaging history to interrogate the ethics of medical progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Narrative and thematic resonance<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Radiology in The Knick<\/em> functions as a metaphor for the broader theme of seeing\u2014both the literal ability to visualize internal anatomy and the moral obligation to see the consequences of one\u2019s actions. The series invites viewers to consider how technological promise can outpace ethical frameworks and how institutional incentives shape adoption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          MA<\/em>S*H<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

          Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          M<\/em>AS<\/em>H* is a landmark series that blends comedy and drama to portray a mobile army surgical hospital during the Korean War. Radiology appears frequently in the form of mobile X\u2011ray units, makeshift darkrooms, and rapid field imaging used to localize shrapnel and fractures. The show\u2019s long run and cultural impact make it a touchstone for how wartime medicine and imaging are represented on television.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Field radiography and improvisation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          M<\/em>AS<\/em>H* emphasizes the improvisational nature of wartime imaging:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            \n
          • Mobile units.<\/strong> The series shows portable X\u2011ray vans and field setups that bring imaging close to the point of care\u2014an accurate reflection of historical practice where mobile radiography improved triage and reduced risky transports.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • Resource constraints.<\/strong> Limited film, damaged equipment, and the need to prioritize imaging for the most salvageable casualties are recurring themes. These constraints force clinicians to make triage decisions that are both clinical and moral.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • Human stories.<\/strong> Radiographs in M<\/em>AS<\/em>H* often reveal personal details\u2014hidden injuries, foreign bodies, or the consequences of trauma\u2014that drive character development and ethical reflection.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

            Realism and legacy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            While the show uses humor to cope with horror, its depiction of field radiography is grounded in historical practice and highlights how imaging can be adapted to austere environments. M<\/em>AS<\/em>H* helped popularize the image of the mobile X\u2011ray unit and underscored the role of imaging in wartime surgical success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            St. Elsewhere<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            St. Elsewhere<\/em> is an influential 1980s medical drama set in an urban teaching hospital. The series is known for its ensemble cast, complex storytelling, and willingness to explore institutional dysfunction. Radiology appears as part of the hospital\u2019s academic life\u2014film conferences, resident teaching, and diagnostic error investigations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Radiology in an academic setting<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            St. Elsewhere<\/em> uses radiology to explore:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              \n
            • Teaching and rounds.<\/strong> Film conferences and radiology rounds are recurring devices that show how imaging is used pedagogically to teach pattern recognition and diagnostic reasoning.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Systems and error.<\/strong> The show dramatizes cases where missed or delayed radiologic findings lead to morbidity, prompting institutional reviews and quality improvement\u2014an early television treatment of systems\u2011based patient safety.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Interdisciplinary negotiation.<\/strong> Radiology is shown as one node in a network of specialties; disagreements over interpretation and management reflect the complexity of academic decision making.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

              Cultural impact<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

              St. Elsewhere<\/em> helped establish the medical drama as a venue for institutional critique and for exploring how imaging fits into larger systems of care. Its influence is visible in later shows that foreground diagnostic uncertainty and organizational dynamics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Chicago Hope<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

              Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Chicago Hope<\/em> is an academic medical drama that often pits clinical idealism against institutional politics. Radiology is central to many of the show\u2019s complex cases\u2014CT, MRI, and angiography are routine tools for surgical planning and for evaluating novel therapies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

              Radiology and institutional conflict<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

              The series uses imaging to dramatize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                \n
              • Access and priority.<\/strong> Who gets advanced imaging and when becomes a point of contention, reflecting real tensions in academic centers where research priorities, insurance, and clinical urgency intersect.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Teaching and innovation.<\/strong> The show depicts radiology as both a clinical service and a research partner, with imaging used to evaluate experimental procedures and to monitor outcomes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Ethical ambiguity.<\/strong> Ambiguous imaging findings are used to stage ethical dilemmas about experimental treatment and informed consent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                Realism and critique<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Chicago Hope<\/em> balances clinical detail with institutional drama, showing how imaging can be both a tool for care and a lever in hospital politics. The series contributed to the genre\u2019s interest in the interplay between technology, research, and patient welfare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Code Black<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Code Black<\/em> dramatizes an overcrowded Los Angeles emergency department where resource scarcity shapes every clinical decision. Radiology is central to the show\u2019s tension: limited CT availability, delayed reads, and the need to prioritize imaging for the most salvageable patients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Resource\u2011limited imaging narratives<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                Key radiology themes in Code Black<\/em> include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  \n
                • Point\u2011of\u2011care ultrasound.<\/strong> The show emphasizes bedside ultrasound as a force multiplier when CT is unavailable, reflecting real trends in emergency medicine where focused exams guide immediate interventions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Triage and ethics.<\/strong> Episodes force clinicians to choose who receives imaging and who must wait, dramatizing the moral weight of such decisions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Training under pressure.<\/strong> Trainees learn to interpret emergent imaging quickly and to make high\u2011stakes decisions with incomplete information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                  Impact and realism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  Code Black<\/em> realistically portrays the operational pressures that can compromise imaging access and the creative clinical adaptations\u2014such as expanded use of ultrasound\u2014that clinicians employ to save lives when resources are constrained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  The Resident<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                  Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  The Resident<\/em> is a contemporary medical drama that critiques health\u2011care systems, focusing on administrative pressures, profit motives, and how these forces affect patient care. Radiology appears in storylines about imaging errors, delayed reads, and the role of interventional radiology in minimally invasive therapy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  Radiology as systems critique<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                  The show uses imaging to explore:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    \n
                  • Quality and safety.<\/strong> Imaging errors and delayed results are used to expose systemic failures and to drive institutional reform narratives.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Interventional radiology.<\/strong> IR is portrayed as a therapeutic partner that can reduce surgical morbidity through embolization, ablation, and image\u2011guided drainage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Operational ethics.<\/strong> The series interrogates how administrative decisions\u2014budget cuts, staffing models\u2014affect imaging quality and patient outcomes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                    Realism and dramatization<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    While The Resident<\/em> sometimes amplifies conflict for dramatic effect, its focus on systems issues resonates with real concerns about how organizational incentives shape diagnostic quality and access to imaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    The Good Doctor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

                    Overview and cultural position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    The Good Doctor<\/em> centers on a surgical team that includes a diagnostically gifted surgeon with autism. Imaging is a frequent narrative device: the protagonist\u2019s visual pattern recognition often hinges on subtle radiologic clues, and the show emphasizes team communication and the ethical dimensions of conveying imaging results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    Radiology and diagnostic reasoning<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                    The series highlights:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      \n
                    • Pattern recognition.<\/strong> CT and MRI findings are used to illustrate how visual cues can lead to correct diagnoses, and the show uses imaging to teach viewers about diagnostic reasoning.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Communication and empathy.<\/strong> Episodes emphasize how imaging results are explained to patients and families, balancing technical detail with compassion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Team dynamics.<\/strong> The show models multidisciplinary decision making where radiology reports are integrated into surgical and medical plans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

                      Impact and limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      The Good Doctor<\/em> popularizes the idea that imaging is both a technical and communicative act. While the show sometimes simplifies the complexity of image interpretation, it does well to foreground the human dimensions of delivering imaging\u2011based diagnoses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                      Closing synthesis<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

                      Across these ten series, television uses radiology in consistent and revealing ways: as a diagnostic engine<\/strong> that reveals hidden pathology, as a procedural partner<\/strong> in image\u2011guided therapy, as a narrative pivot<\/strong> that resolves or complicates plotlines, and as a mirror<\/strong> for ethical and systems\u2011level questions about access, safety, and professional responsibility. Shows vary in their fidelity to clinical workflows\u2014some compress timelines and simplify multidisciplinary coordination for dramatic momentum\u2014yet collectively they have shaped public understanding of imaging\u2019s power and limits.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      TV Shows with Radiology Focus Show Years Network Radiology Prominence Uses ER 1994\u20132009 NBC High Rapid emergency imaging, CT\/ultrasound triage, overnight reads House MD 2004\u20132012 Fox High Imaging as diagnostic pivot; advanced modalities and image\u2011guided biopsies Grey\u2019s Anatomy 2005\u2013present ABC Medium Imaging in surgical planning, incidental findings, multidisciplinary review The Knick 2014\u20132015 Cinemax High Historical […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-radiology-history"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4116"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4117,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4116\/revisions\/4117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rtstudents.com\/radiologyhub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}